USPTO serial 99091459
CARMELIE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FORREST, ELIZABETH P
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CARMELIE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Beijing, CN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David J Beardall
David J Beardall BEARDALL PATENT ASSOCIATES PLLC416 W 40 SProvidence, UT 84332United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dietary supplements; Dietetic preparations adapted for medical purposes; Dietary supplements for animals; Dietary supplements for pets; Dietary supplements for humans; Anti-insect spray; Flea sprays; Antibacterial spray; Anti-cough drops; Vitamin drops | PARTIALLY PAID | Sep 7, 2020 |
| 031 | Animal beverages; Cat food; Edible cat treats; Dog food; Edible dog treats; Edible chews for animals; Edible chews for dogs; Edible food for animals for chewing; Edible organic pet treats for dogs; Food for animals; Edible organic pet treats for cats | PARTIALLY PAID | Sep 7, 2020 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 30, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 26, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |