USPTO serial 99091567
PRODUCTION ENGINEERING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRYGIEL, JONATHAN C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PRODUCTION ENGINEERING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Dayton, OH, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert C. Lukes
Robert C. Lukes Garlington, Lohn & Robinson, PLLP350 Ryman, PO BOX 7909Missoula, MT 59807United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail store and retail on-line ordering services featuring Resistance welding machines, Resistance welding consumables and supplies, Copper and copper tungsten bar stock, Power cables and shunts, Visual flow indicators, Water chillers, Water recirculators, Weld controls, and Welding transformers also accessible by telephone, facsimile and mail order; Retail store services featuring Resistance welding consumables and supplies, Copper and copper tungsten bar stock, Power cables and shunts, Visual flow indicators, Water chillers, Water recirculators, Weld controls, Welding transformers, and Welding transformer supplies | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1953 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 21, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 5, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 5, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 18, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 22, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 2025 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Mar 19, 2025 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |