USPTO serial 99093695
AURASCAPE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 819
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KUYKENDALL, LYNDSEY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AURASCAPE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Clara, CA, US
Santa Clara, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Farah P Bhatti
Farah P Bhatti Buchalter APC18400 Von Karman Ave. Suite 800Irvine, CA 92612United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable cloud-based software for use in network security, network traffic analysis, information security, artificial intelligence security; Downloadable computer networking software; Downloadable computer software for use in network security, network traffic analysis, information security, artificial intelligence security; Downloadable software for application security | ACTIVE | Apr 22, 2025 |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for cybersecurity; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for network security, network traffic analysis and information security services; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for cloud-based technology and artificial intelligence security, monitoring of devices, networks and traffic for the purpose of cybersecurity, information security, network security; Cybersecurity services in the nature of restricting unauthorized access to computer systems; Technology consultation in the field of cybersecurity; Computer security threat analysis for protecting data; Design and development of electronic data security systems; Data security consultancy; Providing on-line non-downloadable software for application security; Computer security service, namely, restricting access to and by computer networks to and of undesired web sites, media and individuals and facilities; Computer services, namely, monitoring and protection of devices and networks for misconfiguration, data breaches, threats and risks to data, users, business and information security; Computer services in the nature of Software as a Service (Saas) and Platform as a Service (PaaS) featuring non-downloadable software related to cybersecurity, network security, network traffic analysis, information security, artificial intelligence security and data breaches; Computer services relating to the monitoring and protection of Artificial Intelligence related activities; Cybersecurity services in the nature of services for monitoring and protecting device and network traffic related to use of Artificial Intelligence and related technologies | ACTIVE | Apr 22, 2025 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2026 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2026 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 22, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 29, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2026 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2026 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2026 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 1, 2026 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2026 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 2, 2025 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 7, 2025 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2025 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 1, 2025 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2025 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 5, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 25, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |