USPTO serial 99093753
RAINCLEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEISS, DANIEL J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RAINCLEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Harbin, Heilongjiang, CN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher J Mayle
Christopher J Mayle Attorney of Record, Florida Bar Member307 W Dr MLK BlvdTampa, FL 33603United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Windscreen wipers; Windshield wiper blades for vehicles; Windscreen wipers for motor cars; Vehicle parts, namely, windshield wipers; Automotive hood ornaments; Automotive interior trim; Plastic parts for vehicles, namely, automotive exterior and interior plastic extruded decorative and protective trim; Seat safety harnesses for motor cars; Aftermarket automobile accessories, namely, luggage bags specially adapted for fitting in the trunk of vehicles; Air vehicles for transport; Sun visors for automobiles; Window rain guards for cars; Leather upholstery for vehicles; Fitted covers for vehicle steering wheels; Antitheft devices for vehicles | ACTIVE | Feb 17, 2025 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 13, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 25, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |