USPTO serial 99096773
SYNEXIS CONSULTING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VAFAI, NIKKI
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 134
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SYNEXIS CONSULTING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Dublin, OH, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Philip R. Zender
Philip R. Zender Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP555 California Street, Suite 550San Francisco, CA 94104United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Technical consulting services in the field of business management consulting services in the field of information technology, namely, IT cost analysis and strategic planning services, software implementation return on investment (ROI) analysis, and software implementation change management support | ACTIVE | Sep 16, 2024 |
| 042 | Technical consulting services in the field of software engineering, management, implementation, and optimization; computer software consulting services; Information Technology (IT) and software services, namely, computer software development, implementation, and consulting services, all in relation to systems applications, software platforms and products in data processing, enterprise resource planning, IT operations management, service management, artificial intelligence, machine learning, generative AI and cloud services; optimization, customization, and integration of enterprise resource planning software | ACTIVE | Sep 16, 2024 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 2, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 13, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Nov 13, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2025 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 4, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |