USPTO serial 99097396
DROPZONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WOLFSEN, CHRISTIANNE LISBETH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DROPZONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chattanooga, TN, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen Adams
Stephen Adams CHAMBLISS, BAHNER & STOPHEL, P.C.605 Chestnut StreetSuite 1700Chattanooga, TN 37450Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Monitoring and positioning system (MPS) that combines a camera system comprised of digital cameras and video cameras with an artificial intelligence-supported computer system comprised of recorded vehicle detection software and a user input system comprising computer keyboards and computer mice, where the MPS is used to precisely position vehicles at a desired location, monitor vehicle status, provide go/no-go indications to users, and provide notifications to users in response to vehicle misalignment, vehicle movement, and vehicle status of the monitored vehicle; camera and artificial intelligence-supported computer system comprised of recorded computer software, digital cameras, video cameras, computer keyboards and computer mice for use in monitoring and positioning vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 9, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 9, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 28, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |