USPTO serial 99101995
KICK FLIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RENNEKER, CHRISTOPHER JOHN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KICK FLIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Changhoon Lee
302 Gangnam-daero, Gangnam-Gu10-14th Floor, Donghee BuildingSeoul, 06253Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Hair combs; non-electric aromatic oil diffusers, other than reed diffusers; dustbins for household purposes; decorative glass spheres; household containers; cooking utensils, non-electric, namely, barbecue branders; souvenir plates; cups; tumblers for use as drinking glasses; tableware, other than knives, forks and spoons, namely, coffee services; kitchen containers for foodstuffs; insulating flasks; buckets; signboards of porcelain or glass; indoor terrariums for plants; tissue box covers; coin banks; dispensers for liquid soap, sold empty; wash basins not being parts of sanitary installations; boxes for sweets; empty water bottles; place mats, not of paper or textile; vases; glass ornaments; china ornaments; shoe horns; candlesticks; spectacle cleaning cloths; electric ultrasonic mosquito killers; electric make-up removing appliances; household gloves for general use; bath brushes; figurines of porcelain, ceramic, earthenware, terra-cotta or glass | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 17, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 14, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 9, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 5, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 6, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 30, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |