USPTO serial 99102160
KITCHEN-ETTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DAVIS, TRENTON MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KITCHEN-ETTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jack A Aini
Jack A Aini Aini & Associates PLLC2615 Coney Island AvenueBrooklyn, NY 11223United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electric food blenders for household purposes; Electric juicers; Electric can openers | ACTIVE | Feb 15, 2025 |
| 008 | Kitchen knives; Table forks | ACTIVE | Feb 15, 2025 |
| 011 | Microwave ovens; Electric toaster ovens; Electric stoves; Electric kettles; Electric toasters | ACTIVE | Feb 15, 2025 |
| 021 | Serving dishes; Kitchen containers; Salt shakers; Non-electric kitchen containers not made of precious metal; Trash cans for household purposes; Serving forks; Cooking spoons; Plates; Baking dishes; Pots; Non-electric cooking pans; Mugs; Cleaning cloths; Non-electric kettles; Non-electric juicers | ACTIVE | Feb 15, 2025 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 26, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 29, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 29, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 29, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 9, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |