USPTO serial 99103403
QOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KHOURI, SANI PHILIPPE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles T. J. Weigell
Charles T. J. Weigell Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.151 W. 42nd Street, 17th FloorNew York, NY 10036United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Toy cars; dolls; toy vehicles; toy aircraft; toy robots; robotic toys, namely, toy robots; remote controls for operating scale model toy vehicles; electric ride-on toy cars for children or infants; toys designed to be attached to car seats; games and playthings, namely, card games, game controllers for computer games; portable games and toys incorporating telecommunication functions; video game apparatus, namely, video game consoles; amusement and game apparatus adapted for use with an external display screen or monitor; machines for physical exercises; bags specially adapted for sports equipment; golf bags; toys for pets; toy action figures; toy figures; toy drones | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 3, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 27, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 29, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 21, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 15, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |