USPTO serial 99103445
DINA-SOUR EGGS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, CLINTON J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DINA-SOUR EGGS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Newport Beach, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Benjamin Ashurov
Benjamin Ashurov KB Ash15 Railoroad AveP.O. Box 10544Danville, CA 94526Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Candy; Hard candy; Confectionery, namely, candy and chocolate; Candies; Hard candies; Candy, namely, dragées | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 30, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 6, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 2, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2026 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2026 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 14, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 15, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 30, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |