USPTO serial 99103513
TECHNOLOGY BEYOND ORDINARY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 681
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MMEJE, OBIEZE GINIKANWA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TECHNOLOGY BEYOND ORDINARY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Britt L. Anderson
Britt L. Anderson ASHURST PERKINS COIE US LLPP.O. Box 2608Seattle, WA 98111United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Engraving machines; cutting machines; laser engraving machines; portable laser engraving machines; laser machines for cutting, marking, and engraving metals, composites materials, elastomers, foams, glasses, ceramics, stone, shell, wood, plastics, paper, textiles, and fabrics, including both rigid and flexible materials; machines and machine tools for precision cutting, etching, engraving, marking, stamping, carving, scoring, trimming, perforating, and material modification for industrial, commercial, home use, medical, automotive, aerospace, electronics, and artistic applications; laser systems comprised of laser engraving machines and cutting machines for commercial, home, and office use, designed for computer-controlled material processing, including material cutting, engraving, marking, etching, scoring, perforating, chemical and physical material modification, imaging, 2D and 3D modeling, additive manufacturing, and printing, consisting of lasers, laser modulation controls, laser beam optics, motion control, and support structures; laser-based systems comprised of cutting machines and engraving machines for use in mass production, prototyping, and precision microfabrication | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Lasers for industrial use; industrial lasers for engraving, marking, cutting, welding, ablation, and sintering applications; industrial lasers for precision processing, including microfabrication and nanostructuring; downloadable software for converting digital photographs and image files into file formats suitable for subsequent use in laser engraving applications; downloadable software for the management and operation of industrial lasers, including real-time adjustment, optimization for different substrates, and predictive modeling for laser-material interactions; downloadable software for generating laser processing parameters using a materials database, with features for process optimization, customization, and automation; downloadable software for remote operation, monitoring, and integration of industrial laser systems with CAD, CAM, and other manufacturing and design tools | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of non-downloadable, cloud-based software for remote operation, monitoring, and integration of industrial laser systems with CAD, CAM, and other manufacturing and design tools | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 19, 2026 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2026 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2026 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2026 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 18, 2026 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2026 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2026 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 16, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jul 16, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 20, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 4, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 8, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Dec 8, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |