USPTO serial 99104067
60 SECONDS!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, HEATHER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with 60 SECONDS!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrzej Malarz
111 Brittany CourtClifton, NJ 07013United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Programmed video games contained on cartridges; Downloadable electronic game software; Downloadable computer game software for personal computers and home video game consoles; Downloadable electronic game software for mobile devices; Downloadable electronic publications, namely, online video games descriptions, video game stories, and informational and promotional newsletters in the field of video games news press releases; Downloadable electronic publications, namely, newsletter publications in the field of video games; Downloadable films featuring video game trailers provided via a video-on-demand service | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Portable video computer games consoles; Portable handheld consoles for playing electronic video games; Electronic interactive board games for use with external monitor; Playing cards; Manipulative logic puzzle; Handheld game consoles; Video game consoles; Table-top games and gambling machines; Electronic games other than those adapted for use with television receivers only; Arcade game machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Computer and video game amusement services, namely, providing online video games | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2026 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 17, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 18, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 18, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 21, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 22, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2025 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |