USPTO serial 99106008
BETTER IS POSSIBLE.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORAN, CAROLINE L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BETTER IS POSSIBLE.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Vanessa A. Ignacio, Esq.
Vanessa A. Ignacio, Esq. Lowenstein Sandler LLPOne Lowenstein DriveRoseland, NJ 07068United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Pharmaceutical research and development; Scientific research and development; Research and development in the field of pharmaceutical preparations, diagnostic products, and medical preparations; Product development in the field of pain management; Product development in the field of pain management using cryoneurolysis and microsphere technology; Research and development of technology in the field of pain management; Research and development in the field of pain management therapies and products; Research and development in the field of gene therapies to treat pain and disease | ACTIVE | Jan 8, 2025 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 8, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 5, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 4, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 4, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |