USPTO serial 99106139
SAGA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIRCHGASSER, ROSS LEONARD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SAGA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cynthia R. Adwere
Cynthia R. Adwere Law Office of Cynthia R. Adwere2625 Middlefield Road, no. 360Palo Alto, CA 94306United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Intelligent natural language understanding services using cloud-based software technology; Intelligent voice recognition services using cloud-based software technology; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable cloud computing software using artificial intelligence (AI) for automating contact center interactions and conversations handled by human agents, for interactive voice response (IVR) and interactive digital responses, and for improving agent productivity and operationalizing real-time intelligence; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in responding to customer inquiries and communicating with others; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable cloud computing software for use in customer relationship management (CRM) | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 2, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 5, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 5, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |