USPTO serial 99113538
SAFERIDE.AI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SENSOR, JAMES EARL
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SAFERIDE.AI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Las Vegas, NV, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ALISA JOY STEINHAUER
ALISA JOY STEINHAUER ALISA J STEINHAUER PLLC5940 S. Rainbow Blvd.Suite 2000Las Vegas, NV 89118Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Recorded computer software and hardware for Vision Assistance of Driver. sold as a unit; Computer hardware with embedded operating system software; Computer hardware with preinstalled operating system software; Computer hardware and recorded software systems for Driver Assistance; Computer hardware with preinstalled software for Visual Assistance for Driver Monitoring and Assistance; Parts for anti-theft automotive alarms, namely, electronic sensors, remote control transmitters and receivers for remotely operating land vehicles; Speed limiters for limiting vehicle engine speed, namely, aftermarket, add-on devices for vehicles in order to limit the maximum speed output of an automobile; Safety and driving assistant system for mobile vehicles and vessels comprised of electronic proximity sensors and switches, high-resolution cameras, integrated circuits for the purpose of imaging processing, and display monitors; Sensors for determining the proximity of a vehicle to other objects; Vehicle safety equipment, namely, an on-board vehicular surveillance system comprised of cameras and monitors for exposing and eliminating the blind spots on both sides of the vehicle; Vehicle locator and recovery device programmed to use global positioning systems (GPS) and cellular telecommunications; Driver impairment detection device in the nature of a fingerprint recognition scanner that activates a timing mechanism to determine the driver's fitness to drive the vehicle; driver impairment detection device in the nature of nystagmus recognition scanner that activates a timing mechanism to determine the driver's fitness to drive the vehicle | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Anti-theft devices for vehicles; Brake hardware for vehicles; Autonomous land vehicles; Braking systems for vehicles and parts thereof; Brake systems for vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Providing an on-line computer database for the reporting and tracking of vehicle and boat moves and location for business purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Vehicle and driver telematic services in the nature of providing information concerning safety risks on driver behavior to consumers and automobile insurance companies; Stolen vehicle tracking; Stolen vehicle tracking services; Tracking of stolen vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2026 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Aug 6, 2026 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Aug 4, 2026 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 27, 2026 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 1, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 14, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |