USPTO serial 99114664
ACCURATE INTELLIGENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 760
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ACCURATE INTELLIGENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Folsom, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JONATHAN O. OWENS
JONATHAN O. OWENS HAVERSTOCK & OWENS, A LAW CORPORATION162 NORTH WOLFE ROADSUNNYVALE, CA 94086UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software and downloadable software applications employing artificial intelligence ("AI"), complemented by human intelligence, to analyze relationships linking nutrition, dietary supplements, drugs, vaccines, lifestyle, genetic, environment, and social determinants ("Factors") to diseases and health conditions ("Conditions"), predict outcomes and recommend ways to maintain health; AI-based downloadable software and downloadable software in the nature of a database used for analyzing Factor and Condition data with patient data, to identify drug and vaccine candidates and make better products efficiently; downloadable software and downloadable software applications using AI, natural language processing, and machine learning supported by scientific evidence to help individuals improve health and wellness, monitor and analyze medical and Factor data, make diagnoses, provide decision support, offer guidance, respond to queries, solve problems, and provide strategies and solutions in medicine and healthcare | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2026 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2026 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 24, 2026 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 24, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 27, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 23, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |