USPTO serial 99115332
GROBOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GROBOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pleasant Hill, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael E. Dergosits
Michael E. Dergosits Dergosits & Noah LLPOne Embarcadero Center, Suite 720San Francisco, CA 94111United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | maintenance of digital twins computer hardware, intelligent agent computer hardware systems, collaborative robot systems, back-end cloud computer hardware infrastructure, front-end web computer interface hardware systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for controlling lighting, watering and ventilation in the field of precision agronomy and predictive and controlled environment agricultural systems; Design, development, and implementation of software for controlled environment agricultural services, real time agricultural monitoring for descriptive and predictive analytics, and automatic anomaly compensation/correction in controlled agricultural environment; Scientific and technological services, namely, research, development and design of digital twins computer network systems, intelligent agent computer systems, collaborative robot systems, back-end cloud computer infrastructure, front-end web computer interface systems; maintenance of computer software for digital twins computer network systems, intelligent agent computer systems, collaborative robot systems, back-end cloud computer infrastructure, front-end web computer interface systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 13, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 13, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 12, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 1, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Dec 1, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |