Drawing for PYLON

USPTO serial 99117055

PYLON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MITROS, CATHERINE SUZANNE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 136

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PYLON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Perry J. Viscounty

Perry J. Viscounty Latham & Watkins LLP650 Town Center Drive, Suite 2000Costa Mesa, CA 92626United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer software for business data analysis using deep learning algorithms and artificial intelligence (AI); Downloadable communication software for use in the fields of customer support, customer relationship management, customer service, customer engagement, and helpdesk functionality, namely, software for monitoring, controlling, and analyzing electronic communications within businesses and between businesses and their customers, text recognition, machine learning, and artificial intelligence software for automated customer support; Downloadable business-to-business (B2B) integration softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 14, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 14, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 14, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 23, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 23, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 22, 2026ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 17, 2026ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 25, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 25, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 4, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 4, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 4, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 24, 2025XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Nov 24, 2025XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 4, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 4, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 2, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 2, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance