USPTO serial 99117526
FLEET PAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SULLIVAN, JOHN C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 133
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FLEET PAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SAN FRANCISCO, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jessica G. McDonald
Jessica G. McDonald Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner P.A.PO Box 2938Minneapolis, MN 55402United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable and recorded computer software for identity verification and authentication of machines; downloadable and recorded computer software for use in the verification and electronic processing of payments for goods and services; downloadable and recorded computer software for accepting, validating, processing, authenticating, managing, and reconciling payment transactions; downloadable and recorded computer software for communicating with inboard vehicle and machine sensor data and third party data to enable the vehicles and machines to be identified by a unique identifier, to connect the vehicles and machines to payment networks, physical infrastructures, and mobility platforms, for use as a payment gateway that validates and authorizes processing of direct payments and enables payment transactions to merchants, service providers, and payees; magnetically encoded credit cards | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Payment and funds verification services; financial risk assessment services; electronic payment services involving electronic processing and subsequent transmission of electronic bill payment data; electronic payment services involving electronic processing and subsequent transmission of electronic bill payment data from vehicles and machines to merchants, service providers, and payees; issuance of credit cards; credit card authorization services; credit card payment processing services; credit card transaction processing services; processing of credit card payments; issuing virtual credit cards; processing virtual credit card payments | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer security services in the nature of providing online electronic verification and authentication of identifications for machines allowing participation of the machine in financial e-commerce transactions; computer security services in the nature of authentication and verification of the identity of electronic machines using inboard vehicle and machine sensor data and third-party data; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring non-downloadable software for use in identity verification and authentication of machines; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring non-downloadable software for use in the verification and electronic processing of payments for goods and services; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring non-downloadable software for accepting, validating, processing, authenticating, managing, and reconciling payment transactions; downloadable and recorded computer software for communicating with inboard vehicle and machine sensor data and third party data to enable the vehicles and machines to be identified by a unique identifier, to connect the vehicles and machines to payment networks, physical infrastructures, and mobility platforms, for use as a payment gateway that validates and authorizes processing of direct payments and enables payment transactions to merchants, service providers, and payees; custom design of computer software; design and development of computer hardware and computer software; research, development, design and upgrading of computer software; computer software consulting | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 17, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 17, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Nov 17, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |