Drawing for BLITZ

USPTO serial 99118235

BLITZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HERRERA-MARCUS, ROSELLE MORALDE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 124

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLITZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Energy drinksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 10, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 17, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 16, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 16, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 16, 2026NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
May 16, 2026PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 16, 2026PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2026MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 16, 2026ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 30, 2025XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Nov 30, 2025XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 2, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 2, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance