Drawing for STING

USPTO serial 99119119

STING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 748
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HILL, MARK THOMAS
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 129

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christina M. Licursi

Christina M. Licursi Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.600 Atlantic AvenueBoston, MA 02210-2206United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Drone defense systems comprised of computer hardware and recorded and downloadable software for the operation of counter-unmanned aerial intelligence and defeat systems; downloadable computer software for the alerting and interdiction of drones and unmanned aerial vehicles; computer hardware and recorded and downloadable software for the operation of counter-unmanned aerial intelligence and defeat systemsACTIVEMay 29, 2026
012Drones; Unmanned aerial system (UAS), namely, unmanned aerial vehiclesACTIVEMay 29, 2026
013FirearmsACTIVEMay 29, 2026

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 18, 2026EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2026SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 17, 2026EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 17, 2026AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 10, 2026IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 10, 2026EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 10, 2026EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Sep 10, 2026EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 10, 2026NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 13, 2026NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 13, 2026PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 7, 2026NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2025CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 10, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 10, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 21, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 2, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 15, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 3, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 3, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance