USPTO serial 99122771
COGNITIVE HARM REDUCTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEDNARZ, DUSTIN THOMAS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 132
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COGNITIVE HARM REDUCTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational services, namely, conducting Educational services, namely, conducting online and in person: classes, seminars, conferences, retreats and workshops in the field of cognitive harm reduction, that is, strategies to identify, prevent, and mitigate cognitive harm—the negative effects on metacognition, cognitive functioning and patient care arising not only from stress, anxiety, depression, trauma and rumination but also from the negative states created by interactions, encounters, treatments, and other environmental or relational factors—by promoting a higher standard of treatment and equipping participants with tools and techniques to reduce the occurrence of cognitive harm in themselves and in their professional practices; providing training in best practices including metacognitive awareness, guided audio journeys, mindfulness practices, breathwork, journaling, art therapy, recreation therapy, self‑governance of thought patterns, empathetic communication, and reflective practices, as well as methods to avoid perpetuating harmful cognitive patterns in clinical and organizational settings; developing, publishing, and distributing both downloadable and non‑downloadable educational materials, including audio journeys, e‑books, articles, blogs, illustrations, podcasts, videos, multimedia content, and toolkits; conducting research and providing educational information via the internet; offering virtual and professional coaching services in cognitive harm reduction methodologies; and providing educational examinations, testing, and certification in cognitive harm reduction for individuals and providers. and distribution of training material in connection therewith | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 30, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 11, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |