USPTO serial 99123182
DELIVERING INNOVATION, DRIVING IMPACT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCARTHY, JOSEPH PATRICK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DELIVERING INNOVATION, DRIVING IMPACT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Jose, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Utsav Mukherjee
Utsav Mukherjee ONE JURIS PC5233 Fresno AvenueRichmond, CA 94804United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Information technology consulting services related to the installation and maintenance of enterprise software, for use in identifying new systems and retiring legacy applications; IT integration services, in the nature of integrating systems and processes between organizations, designing custom applications, developing mobility solutions, and consolidating data from multiple sources; Cloud computing services offering temporary use of non-downloadable software for sales, ERP, customer service, finance, HCM, IT management, business intelligence, data analytics, and IT operations; Application service provider (ASP) services featuring software for installing, upgrading, testing, and integrating enterprise applications; Software testing services, featuring manual and automated testing of enterprise, cloud, mobile, and custom applications, and performance testing for bugs and bottlenecks; Computer technology services for data recovery, analytics, and web portal development; Technical support services for infrastructure and databases, including system monitoring, backups, security, helpdesk, database administration, and application support; Software as a Service (SaaS) services featuring software for enterprise data integration, analytics, and enabling AI interoperability with computer systems | PARTIALLY PAID | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 7, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 3, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 31, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 4, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |