USPTO serial 99123414
JUNCTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 760
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOUTS, KAREN JEANNE SEPUR
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JUNCTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Claymont, DE, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RYAN S. HILBERT
RYAN S. HILBERT HOLLEY & MENKER PAPO Box 331937Atlantic Beach, FL 32233United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Platform as a Service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for use in facilitating access to and the exchange of medical information and medical diagnostics data between physicians, patients, laboratories, healthcare providers and healthcare vendors; Platform as a Service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for use in medical treatment planning and diagnoses and facilitating diagnostic workflows; Platform as a Service PAAS featuring computer software platforms for facilitating access to medical diagnostic testing, monitoring, and reporting services through integration with third-party laboratories, healthcare providers, and diagnostic platforms; Platform as a Service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for use in collecting, storing, compiling, analyzing, sharing, exporting and transmitting data and information from wireless monitoring devices, medical devices and medical wearables to physicians, patients, laboratories, clinics and healthcare vendors; Platform as a Service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for the collection, aggregation, interpretation, analysis, integration, visualization, notification and distribution of personal health information for use in remote monitoring and data analysis; Platform as a Service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for use in locating laboratories, clinics and healthcare vendors and for use in ordering and reviewing medical testing, diagnostics and results; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software development kits (SDKs); Computer consulting services for the creation of healthcare information technology; Development, updating, and maintenance of software and database systems in the field of health and medicine; Technical support services, namely, providing implementation support and configuration guidance for customers using proprietary healthcare software platforms; Platform as a Service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for coordinating self-administered specimen collection, including managing the ordering, packaging, labeling, and shipping of test kits for laboratory analysis, and for tracking logistics and status of specimen transit and results delivery | ACTIVE | Mar 11, 2025 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 5, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2026 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2026 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 5, 2026 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 1, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jul 1, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 3, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 5, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 6, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |