USPTO serial 99124111
CYBERSPA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BURKE, JUSTINE N
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CYBERSPA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark D. Schneider
Mark D. Schneider Dinsmore & Shohl LLP755 West Big Beaver RoadSuite 1900Troy, MI 48084Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Water pumps for foot spas; foot spa products, namely, pump impellers, pump impeller housings and drive units as parts for pump units | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Salon chairs, namely, massage chairs with built-in massage apparatus combined with a foot spa in the nature of an electric foot bath apparatus for recreational, therapeutic and pedicure purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Foot spas, namely, electric foot bath apparatus for recreational, therapeutic and pedicure purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Salon chairs combined with a foot spa in the nature of an electric foot bath apparatus for recreational, therapeutic and pedicure purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 15, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 13, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 2, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 2, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 29, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 29, 2025 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2025 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2025 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 18, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 3, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |