USPTO serial 99128795
MULTIPLEXER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BURKE, JUSTINE N
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MULTIPLEXER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Gundelfingen, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter J. Phillips
Peter J. Phillips Lucas & Mercanti, LLP100 South Jefferson RoadSuite 202Whippany, NJ 07981Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines, installations and systems for dosing of media, in particular fluids, and parts therefor, in particular, pumps for dosing different liquid washing, cleaning and disinfection chemicals, from different separate compartments, along fluid lines to different particular target apparatus using a pump for sucking chemicals, a switching device for switching fluid lines from the different chemicals from the separate compartments, for different liquid washing, cleaning and disinfection installations | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Equipment and apparatus for dispensing of media, in particular of fluids, and parts therefor, in particular, pumps for dosing different liquid washing, cleaning and disinfection chemicals, from different separate compartments, along fluid lines to different particular target apparatus using a pump for sucking chemicals, a switching device for switching fluid lines from the different chemicals from the separate compartments for different washing, cleaning, and disinfection installations; downloadable computer Software application for operating the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 4, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 28, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 9, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 8, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 8, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jan 8, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |