Drawing for LATELY

USPTO serial 99135134

LATELY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LUEKEN, ABIGAIL JOSEPHINE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LATELY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RYAN MATHEW KAISER

RYAN MATHEW KAISER AMIN WASSERMAN GURNANI, LLP230 W. Monroe St.Suite 1405Chicago, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Prepared alcoholic cocktailACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 14, 2026ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 6, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 6, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 26, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 26, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 26, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 26, 2026NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
May 26, 2026PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 26, 2026PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2026MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 26, 2026ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 10, 2025XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Dec 10, 2025XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 14, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 14, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 14, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance