USPTO serial 99136483
SNARLY MCCHEW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 774
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MINAYA, NYASIA ALYSSA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SNARLY MCCHEW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SHANE PERCIVAL
SHANE PERCIVAL NOD LAW PC726 FRONT ST.SUITE 220LOUISVILLE, CO 80027Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing consumer information in the field of animals and pets relating to pet products, pet treats and pet toys; Demonstration of products for others, namely, using a mechanical device to demonstrate to consumers the hardness of a material; Demonstration of products for others, namely, using a mechanical device to demonstrate to consumers the hardness of a pet product; Demonstration of products for others, namely, using a mechanical device to demonstrate to consumers the hardness of a pet toy; Demonstration of products for others, namely, using a mechanical device to sell pet products; Demonstration of products for others, namely, using a mechanical device resembling a creature to demonstrate the material properties of a resilient material; Demonstration of products for others, namely, using a mechanical device resembling a creature to demonstrate the material properties of a pet toy; Demonstration of products for others, namely, using a mechanical device to provide material property information to consumers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2026 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 15, 2026 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 14, 2026 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 30, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2025 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2025 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 10, 2025 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2025 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 16, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |