Drawing for H2OWIZE

USPTO serial 99138283

H2OWIZE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 616
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLUE, MICHALA J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with H2OWIZE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paulo A. de Almeida

Paulo A. de Almeida Wolf, Rifkin, Shapiro, Schulman & Rabkin, LLP11400 West Olympic Blvd.9th FloorLos Angeles, CA 90064

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Agricultural irrigation units in the nature of landscape dripper irrigation water conservation systems for trees and shrubs in the nature of circular plastic tubing with well channels for water collection for use with irrigation sprinklersACTIVEFeb 15, 2019

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 16, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 16, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 16, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 16, 2026NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Oct 16, 2026PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 16, 2026PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2026MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 15, 2026ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 1, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 8, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 8, 2026ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 4, 2026ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 10, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 10, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 10, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 9, 2025XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Dec 9, 2025XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 24, 2025MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 15, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 15, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance