USPTO serial 99138996
OTTO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHONG, JESSICA EUNKYO
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OTTO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas M. Hadid
Thomas M. Hadid Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLPFloor 40350 South Grand AvenueLos Angeles, CA 90071Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Provision of an online marketplace for buyers and sellers of auto body repair services; connecting qualified automobile body repair service providers with consumers through a digital platform for the purpose of obtaining repair quotes, scheduling appointments, and communicating repair needs; providing consumer information in the field of cosmetic vehicle damage and repair options via a mobile application; none of the foregoing involving financial services, insurance brokerage, insurance quote comparison, or bill payment processing. | ACTIVE | Apr 15, 2025 |
| 042 | Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring non-downloadable software for analyzing photographs of cosmetic car damage using computer vision and AI to generate repair assessments and pricing estimates; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for consumers to receive AI-generated repair advice, track vehicle damage history, and compare repair options; software as a service (SaaS) featuring auto body repair shops to receive quote requests, view image-based assessments, and manage customer communications; none of the foregoing involving insurance quote comparison, insurance brokerage, financial services, or bill payment functionality | ACTIVE | Apr 15, 2025 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 5, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 15, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 16, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 16, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |