USPTO serial 99139791
EFFI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GREEN, ASHLEY ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EFFI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New Rochelle, NY, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas W Brooke
Thomas W Brooke Holland & Knight LLP800 17th St NWSuite 1100Washington, DC 20006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Online advertising and marketing services by means of generating insights from audience engagement during interactive events online to help businesses develop and optimize targeted campaigns | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Transmission of sound and vision via satellite or interactive multimedia networks; Streaming of audio, visual and audiovisual material via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for streaming and simulcasting audio, video, and audio-visual content on the internet; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for engaging with audiences via interactive digital content; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for engaging with audiences via interactive digital content; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for facilitating customized communications, advertisements, and financial transactions during and after live-streamed content; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for providing actionable insights and analytics on digital content and audience engagement that incorporates artificial intelligence and machine learning to enhance data analysis | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 2, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 8, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 16, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Dec 15, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |