USPTO serial 99141110
AIBUILD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 760
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AIBUILD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RYAN S. HILBERT
RYAN S. HILBERT HOLLEY & MENKER PAPO Box 331937Atlantic Beach, FL 32233United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software for use in performing three-dimensional printing and automating workflow solutions in the field of additive manufacturing; Software for generating instructions for controlling the operation of additive manufacturing machines and for use in performing metal three-dimensional printing and automating three-dimensional printing workflows in the field of additive manufacturing, recorded; Downloadable software using artificial intelligence, machine learning, and deep learning for use in performing three-dimensional printing and automating workflow solutions in the field of additive manufacturing; Downloadable software using artificial intelligence, machine learning, and deep learning for generating instructions for controlling the operation of additive manufacturing machines and for use in performing metal three-dimensional printing and automating three-dimensional printing workflows in the field of additive manufacturing | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS), providing temporary use of non-downloadable software, and providing temporary use of non-downloadable artificial intelligence software for use in performing three-dimensional printing and automating workflow solutions in the field of additive manufacturing; Software as a service (SAAS), providing temporary use of non-downloadable software, and providing temporary use of non-downloadable artificial intelligence software for generating instructions for controlling the operation of additive manufacturing machines and for use in performing metal three-dimensional printing and automating three-dimensional printing workflows in the field of additive manufacturing; Software as a service (SAAS) and providing temporary use of non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence, machine learning, and deep learning for use in performing three-dimensional printing and automating workflow solutions in the field of additive manufacturing; Software as a service (SAAS) and providing temporary use of non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence, machine learning, and deep learning for generating instructions for controlling the operation of additive manufacturing machines and for use in performing metal three-dimensional printing and automating three-dimensional printing workflows in the field of additive manufacturing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 2, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2026 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2026 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 2, 2026 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 3, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Aug 3, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 2, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 2, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 2, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 27, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Dec 27, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |