Drawing for R2G2

USPTO serial 99142141

R2G2

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STEEL, ALYSSA PALADINO
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with R2G2?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patrick O'Brien

141 West Jackson Blvd.Suite 500Chicago, IL 60604

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software that incorporates, accesses, uses, and interacts with an artificial intelligence program model to perform generative text artificial intelligence (AI) tasks and natural language processing artificial intelligence (AI) tasks and to produce written content based on a theme, text summaries, document question-answering and natural conversation simulation; application service provider featuring application programming interface (API) software for performing generative text artificial intelligence (AI) tasks and natural language processing artificial intelligence (AI) tasks and for writing content based on a theme, summarizing text, document question-answering and simulating natural conversation; software as a service (SAAS) featuring software using artificial intelligence for performing generative text artificial intelligence (AI) tasks and natural language processing artificial intelligence (AI) tasks and for writing content based on a theme, summarizing text, document question-answering and simulating natural conversationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 9, 2026MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 9, 2026ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 7, 2026NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 10, 2026NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 10, 2026PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 4, 2026NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 13, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 13, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 13, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 23, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 22, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 17, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 17, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance