USPTO serial 99147519
EMI JAY HOLY GRAIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EMI JAY HOLY GRAIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Van Nuys, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THEODORE SY NGUYEN
THEODORE SY NGUYEN NOLAN HEIMANN LLP16000 Ventura Blvd., Suite 1200Encino, CA 91436United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair spray, with none of the aforementioned products being face oils | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 23, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 21, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 25, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 24, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |