USPTO serial 99148046
BENETA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEARNED, GLEN D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 131
What this means
Status 680 means the examining attorney approved your mark for publication in the USPTO Official Gazette. Publication for opposition usually follows within weeks, opening a 30-day window for third parties to oppose. Watch for publication (status 686) and monitor the 30-day opposition window.
Need help with BENETA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Hwaseong-si, Gyeonggi-do, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jihun Kim
Jihun Kim Bridgeway IP Law Group, PLLC11350 Random Hills RdFairfax, VA 22030United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Semiconductor wafer processing machines; Machines for manufacturing semiconductors; Industrial machinery, namely, automated machines for washing semiconductors; Industrial machinery, namely, machines for manufacturing semiconductors; Industrial machinery, namely, semi-conductor substrates manufacturing machines; Industrial machinery, namely, strip machines for semiconductor wafers; Industrial machinery, namely, ashing machines for semiconductor wafers; Industrial machinery, namely, etching machines for manufacturing semiconductors; Industrial machinery, namely, chemical vapor deposition (CVD) machines for use in manufacturing semiconductors; Industrial machinery, namely, marking machines using lasers for marking semiconductors; Industrial machinery, namely, laser machines for marking semiconductors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 25, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 22, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 18, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 18, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 20, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 15, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |