USPTO serial 99148732
MARK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KOZAK, EVIN L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 131
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MARK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Daly City, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel P. Mullarkey
Daniel P. Mullarkey Polsinelli PCPO Box 140310Kansas City, MO 64114-0310United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electronic device in the nature of computer hardware featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) that enables users to bookmark, index, store, collect, share and summarize content from physical reading materials such as books, pamphlets, magazines, newspapers and catalogs; downloadable software application that allows users to bookmark, index, store, collect, annotate, share, and summarize content, including quotation extractions, personal recommendations, syncing features, user insights and collaboration features from physical reading materials such as books, pamphlets;, magazines, newspapers and catalogs | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | providing online non-downloadable software that uses artificial intelligence (AI) to enable users to bookmark, index, store, collect, share and summarize content, including quotation extractions, personal recommendations, syncing features, user insights and collaboration features from physical reading materials such as books, pamphlets; magazines, newspapers and catalogs; providing an interactive webpage for bookmarking, indexing, collecting, storing, sharing and summarizing content from physical reading materials such as books, pamphlets;, magazines, newspapers and catalogs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 5, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 17, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 17, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 2025 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |