USPTO serial 99151039
VS VEIL SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 794
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REYNOLDS,DYLAN M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 130
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VS VEIL SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Marietta, GA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BOBBY W. BRAXTON
BOBBY W. BRAXTON BRAXTON PERRONE, PLLC2201 SPINKS ROADSUITE 154FLOWER MOUND, TX 75022Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 013 | Firearms; Firearm attachments, namely, modular external rail systems for firearms; Firearm receivers; Firearm hand guards; Magazines for firearms; Firearm attachments, namely, mounts for attaching grips to a firearm | ACTIVE | Jul 12, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2026 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 12, 2026 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2026 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2026 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 6, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 2, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2026 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2026 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 2, 2026 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 2, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Apr 2, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 5, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 11, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 17, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2025 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |