USPTO serial 99155046
CHEMISTRY BY DESIGN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAROTTA, GABRIELLE CHRISTINA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHEMISTRY BY DESIGN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Schaumburg, IL, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer Lacroix
Jennifer Lacroix Amundsen Davis LLC111 East Kilbourn Avenue, Suite 1400Milwaukee, WI 53202United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | Manufacturing services for others of specialty chemicals, namely, chemical formulations for general industrial use in the manufacture of a wide variety of goods. | ACTIVE | Apr 24, 2025 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2026 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jul 31, 2026 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jul 30, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Apr 30, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 30, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 22, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 24, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |