USPTO serial 99155392
TOMO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KOLODNER, LOUIS FRANCIS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TOMO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Zachary W. Hilton
Zachary W. Hilton Brown Fox PLLC8111 Preston Rd Ste 300Dallas, TX 75225United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for facilitating communications between stakeholders, team members and customers, and for soliciting feedback from customers; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for sharing, collecting, tracking, managing, using and streamlining access to select data and information therefrom; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for customer and stakeholder feedback management and market research; Providing on-line non-downloadable software for facilitating communications between stakeholders, team members and customers, collecting feedback from customers, and sharing, customizing, collecting, tracking, managing, using and streamlining access to select data and information therefrom; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for facilitating communications with, and gathering feedback from, customers and other end-users for the purpose of improving products and services, compliance with standards, and meeting sales, marketing and business goals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 4, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 3, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 8, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 17, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |