USPTO serial 99158415
ACUITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, KAREINE D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 131
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ACUITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Marlborough, MA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott J. Slavick
Scott J. Slavick Barack Ferrazzano Kirschbaum & Nagelberg LLP200 West Madison Street, Suite 3900Chicago, IL 60606United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software using advanced analytics including artificial intelligence, for performance monitoring, and asset performance management of electric power utility grade equipment; high voltage and medium voltage electrical power transformers; Electrical power transformer-related components, bushings, load tap changers, and surge arresters; high voltage and medium voltage electrical gas-insulated switchgear and switching related components; medium voltage air-insulated switchgear and switching related components; high voltage and medium voltage electrical power cable applications and related components; electric power utility generation grade rotating generators, stators, bus duct systems; electric power utility grade rotating motors; high voltage and medium voltage electrical applications for transforming, regulating and adapting electric power voltage or current | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software -as-a-service (SaaS) featuring software for performance monitoring, asset performance management and artificial intelligence for insulating liquid filled high voltage and medium voltage electric power apparatus applications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2026 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Aug 18, 2026 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2026 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| May 20, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 21, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 24, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 22, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |