USPTO serial 99160125
CYVISIONGPT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILLER,CHARLES FREDERICK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CYVISIONGPT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan Agmon
Jonathan Agmon Soroker Agmon Nordman305 Broadway, Suite 700New York, NY 10007United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable digital video recording software for IP (Internet protocol) video surveillance; Downloadable computer software for processing digital images; Downloadable computer programs for use in video intelligence software in the fields of smart city solutions, road and traffic analysis, road safety, road enforcement, roadworks compliance, micromobility, airport security and operational efficiency, seaport operations, prisons and correctional facilities; Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for use in video intelligence in the fields of smart city solutions, road and traffic analysis, road safety, road enforcement, roadworks compliance, micromobility, airport security and operational efficiency, seaport operations, prisons and correctional facilities. | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing on-line non-downloadable software for use in video intelligence software in the fields of smart city solutions, road and traffic analysis, road safety, road enforcement, roadworks compliance, micromobility, airport security and operational efficiency, seaport operations, prisons and correctional facilities; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable cloud computing software for use in video intelligence software in the fields of smart city solutions, road and traffic analysis, road safety, road enforcement, roadworks compliance, micromobility, airport security and operational efficiency, seaport operations, prisons and correctional facilities;; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for use in software , for use in video intelligence software in the fields of smart city solutions, road and traffic analysis, road safety, road enforcement, roadworks compliance, micromobility, airport security and operational efficiency, seaport operations, prisons and correctional facilities;; Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for facial and speech recognition in the field of video intelligence; Providing information relating to computer technology and programming via a website; Computer technology consultancy in the field of video surveillance and video intelligence | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 12, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 4, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |