USPTO serial 99160812
HEIST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICKS, AUDREY NICOLE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HEIST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Houston, TX, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ERIN ELIZABETH RODGERS
ERIN ELIZABETH RODGERS RODGERS SELVERA PLLC4201 Main St.Suite 200-184Houston, TX 77002Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Baseball caps and hats; T-shirts; Graphic T-shirts; Long sleeve T-shirts; Short sleeve T-shirts; Sweatshirts; Bandanas | ACTIVE | Aug 22, 2022 |
| 035 | Production of video recordings for marketing purposes; Advertising agency specializing in the development and execution of word of mouth, viral, buzz and experiential marketing programs; Talent agency services for employment and management of performing artist | ACTIVE | Aug 22, 2022 |
| 041 | Entertainment services in the nature of organizing social entertainment events; Entertainment services in the nature of hosting social entertainment events; Entertainment event booking agencies; Event management services being organizing and conducting educational events in the field of the entertainment industry; Entertainment services, namely, conducting parties | ACTIVE | Aug 22, 2022 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 20, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 14, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 14, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 5, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 18, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |