USPTO serial 99161052
BRONZE WING AUSTRALIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GERMICK JR., EDWARD JOSEPH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 131
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with BRONZE WING AUSTRALIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Winfield B. Martin
Winfield B. Martin Ashurst Perkins Coie US LLPP.O. Box 2608Seattle, WA 98111United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | clay pigeons; launchers for clay pigeons; archery implements; archery targets; archery bags, namely, bags for archery bows and bags for archery arrows; bags specifically adapted to carry target launchers for clay pigeon shooting; toy guns; bags specifically adapted for carrying sporting articles, namely, archery bows; bags used for hunting, namely, bags specifically adapted to hold archery bows | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 6, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 30, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 30, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 24, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2025 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2025 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| May 1, 2025 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |