USPTO serial 99161081
BRONZE WING AUSTRALIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GERMICK JR., EDWARD JOSEPH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 131
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with BRONZE WING AUSTRALIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Winfield B. Martin
Winfield B. Martin Ashurst Perkins Coie US LLPP.O. Box 2608Seattle, WA 98111United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | engines and motors except for land vehicles; machine tools, namely, gear cutters; machine tools for compacting powder and for manufacturing clay pigeon targets; lifting machines for containers, clay pigeon target boxes, and shooting range equipment, namely, automatic target retrieval systems, motorized target carriers, electromechanical target movers, target turning machines, automatic target reset machines, rotating and pop‑up target mechanisms, running target machines, mechanized bullet traps, lead‑collection machines, brass‑collecting machines, industrial range cleaning machines, mechanized steel target resetting tools, and ventilation blowers and air‑processing machines for shooting ranges; leather buffing machines; packing machines; material handling machines, namely, palletizers; assembling machines for ammunition and clay pigeon target launchers; shaping machines; laser and electric welding machines; weeding machines; wrapping machines; fertilizer distributing machines, other than hand-operated implements; agricultural seed planting machine; rice transplanting machines; reapers; electromechanical machines for the agriculture industry, namely, cultivators, harvesters, seeders; seed drills for agricultural machines; agricultural seed planting machines; agricultural machines, namely, cultipackers, agricultural seed planting machines; agricultural machines, namely, cultivators; agricultural elevators; agricultural implements, namely, seed drills, hay balers; agricultural, earthmoving, construction, oil and gas extraction and mining equipment, namely, high-pressure pumps for use in oil or gas well hydraulic fracturing operations, bulldozers, and mining machines; service robots, namely, laser welding robots; 3D printers | ACTIVE | — |
| 013 | ammunition; ammunition and projectiles; ammunition belts; ammunition for firearms; ammunition casings; ammunition for rifles; ammunition for small arms; automatic firearm ammunition belts; bags specially made for ammunition; rifle ammunition; small arms ammunition; cases for large size ammunition; belts adapted for ammunition | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | clothing, namely, shirts, pants, socks, jackets, and vests; footwear; headware; clothing made of leather, namely, vests, jackets, and boots; clothes for sports, namely, shooting jerseys and hunting pants; headbands being clothing; headscarves; hoods; leather belts being clothing; military clothing, namely, uniforms, shirts, and hats; neck bands; muffs; mufflers as neck scarves | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 6, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 12, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 24, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2025 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2025 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Apr 30, 2025 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |