USPTO serial 99163817
CLARITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PURATH, ANICKA S
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with CLARITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mountain View, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LEONARD P. LINARDAKIS
Leonard P. Linardakis Moser Taboada1040 Broad Street, Suite 103Suite 103Shrewsbury, NJ 07702Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Marketing services rendered using artificial intelligence (AI) | ACTIVE | Apr 30, 2023 |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services using artificial intelligence for managing electronic shopping transactions, namely, the on line sales of consumer goods and services and which exclude payment transactions to healthcare providers; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for the function of analyzing user behavior and product data, and for automatically generating personalized product descriptions and recommendations, marketing copy, search result summaries, and product category descriptions; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software that functions for the purpose of allowing website visitors and users of software applications to search products and services for others; Software as a service (SaaS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for the development, deployment, and integration of software application programs information assets to create a context-based user experience with the function of providing user-search functions that enable users to find and filter products and services using natural language queriers, visual search and personalized search results, merchandised websites, portals, namely, web-based customer interfaces and dashboards for accessing e-commerce platforms and analytics, mobile applications, and internet connected experiences, namely, omnichannel digital experiences across web, mobile, messaging, and connected device interfaces that provide personalized content and commerce functionality; Providing a web hosting platform for use by others as a digital experience platform for allowing users to perform electronic business transactions, namely, managing electronic shopping transactions for the online sales of consumer goods and services, and which exclude payment transactions to healthcare providers; Platform as a service (PaaS) featuring computer ecommerce software platforms for allowing users to perform electronic business transactions via a global computer network, namely, managing electronic shopping transactions for the on-line sales of consumer goods and services and which exclude payment transactions to healthcare providers; Software as a Service (SaaS) services featuring analytical software facilitating the use of customer data by businesses to improve customer experience and make operational decisions; Providing online non-downloadable computer software for use as an application programming interface (API) for interpreting, analyzing, updating, re-categorizing online content, namely, user behavior and product data and which automatically generates and updates online content; Providing online non-downloadable computer software for use as an application programming interface (API) that functions for the purpose of allowing website visitors and users of software applications to search products and services for others and to comment on the products and services of others; All aforementioned services not in the context of security in military applications, law enforcement, defense and military | ACTIVE | Sep 30, 2023 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 12, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2026 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2026 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 12, 2026 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 14, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| May 8, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 12, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 8, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 21, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Nov 21, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |