USPTO serial 99165712
HEADWATERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HANNAH, JESSICA L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HEADWATERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Westlake Village, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven C. Sereboff
Steven C. Sereboff SoCal IP Law Group LLP310 N. Westlake Blvd., Suite 120Westlake Village, CA 91362United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consulting services in the field of sustainable agricultural sourcing, namely organic, conventionally grown crops; Business consulting and advisory services in the field of energy efficiency; Business consultation in the field of planning, organization, management and monitoring of agricultural enterprises, namely organic, conventionally grown crops; Business consulting services in the agriculture field, namely organic, conventionally grown crops; Business management services, namely, administration of business engaged in cultivation management of organic, conventionally grown crops; all of the foregoing excluding biotechnology and pharmaceuticals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |