USPTO serial 99166985
INHABIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 616
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCNAMARA, SHANA MARIE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INHABIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott E. Rogers
Scott E. Rogers UB GREENSFELDER LLP200 W. Madison Street, Suite 3300Chicago, IL 60606United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Hotel accommodation services; Provision of temporary accommodation; Hotel room booking services; Hospitality services in the nature of provision of temporary accommodation; Provision of food and drink; Travel agency services, namely, making reservations and booking for temporary lodging; Provision of conference facilities; Provision of facilities for conventions; Provision of facilities for exhibitions and conferences; Arranging of holiday accommodation; Providing conference, exhibition and meeting facilities; Arranging temporary accommodation; Rental of temporary accommodation; Providing temporary accommodation at event facilities, temporary office and meeting facilities; Bar and restaurant services; Public house services; Café services; Catering services; Cafés; Providing food and drink catering services; Hospitality services in the nature of provision of food and drink; Hotel accommodation services featuring a customer loyalty program; Hotel restaurant services; Hotel catering services; Reservation of hotel rooms for travellers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 24, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 10, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |