USPTO serial 99167660
EMERGENT INTELLIGENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 760
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, DAVID T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EMERGENT INTELLIGENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MAXIMILIAN D. MEESE
MAXIMILIAN D. MEESE THE WEBB LAW FIRMONE GATEWAY CENTER420 FT DUQUESNE BLVD, SUITE 1200PITTSBURGH, PA 15222Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational services, namely, conducting classes in the field of artificial intelligence and distribution of educational materials in connection therewith | ACTIVE | Oct 19, 2026 |
| 042 | Providing on-line non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence (AI) for use in computer-networked systems to perform item recommendation, in computer-networked systems to perform object classification, in computer-networked systems to perform natural language processing, in computer-networked systems to perform data analysis, and in computer-networked systems to perform text, image, and video generation; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for use in computer-networked systems to perform item recommendation, in computer-networked systems to perform object classification, in computer-networked systems to perform natural language processing, in computer-networked systems to perform data analysis, and in computer-networked systems to perform text, image, and video generation; Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for use in computer-networked systems to perform item recommendation, in computer-networked systems to perform object classification in computer-networked systems to perform natural language processing, in computer-networked systems to perform data analysis, and in computer-networked systems to perform text, image, and video generation | ACTIVE | Oct 19, 2026 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2026 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 20, 2026 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2026 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2026 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2026 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 20, 2026 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 13, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jul 13, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 20, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 20, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Dec 9, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |