Drawing for SALT CITY GRILLZ

USPTO serial 99168012

SALT CITY GRILLZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHANG,ELIZABETH YI HSUAN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SALT CITY GRILLZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David Hester

David Hester Rocket Legal Professional Services, Inc.3137 E Elwood ST STE 130, DPT#EXAZ1394Phoenix, UT 85034United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Jewelry; Jewelry that fits over the front teeth; Dental jewelry in the nature of tooth gems; Dental jewelry in the nature of tooth charmsACTIVESep 15, 2016

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 5, 2026MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 5, 2026ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 4, 2025GAUNNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2025GAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2025NAUDREPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED—
Dec 2, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 2, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 22, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 11, 2025MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 2, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 2, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance