USPTO serial 99168033
NASHVILLE CATS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PARADEWELAI, BENJI YUEN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NASHVILLE CATS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Margaret Shehan
Margaret Shehan Milom Crow Kelley Beckett Shehan PLC3310 West End AvenueSuite 570Nashville, TN 37203Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational services, namely, conducting live and online programs in the fields of music; Providing on-line non-downloadable electronic publications in the nature of articles, all in the fields of music; Providing on-line non-downloadable multi-media materials, in the nature of audio and video recordings, all in the fields of music; Providing a website featuring non-downloadable multi-media content in the nature of audio recordings, video recordings, and audio-visual content, in the nature of multimedia program segments and interviews, all in the fields of music and music education; Entertainment services, namely, providing information relating to music and musical entertainment; Entertainment services, namely, providing online non-downloadable continuing audio and audio-visual program related to music; Providing online non-downloadable videos featuring interviews and music; Providing non-downloadable videos featuring music programs and musical performances | ACTIVE | Aug 19, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 8, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 15, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 12, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 2, 2026 | GAUN | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2026 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2026 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 23, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Dec 22, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |